Eps 558: The Hidden Mystery Behind Self-sacrifice
— The too lazy to register an account podcast
The demand of the other with a small "o" passes mistily over into the claim of the other with a big "O," the demand of transcendence, of deity.
What I am suggesting is that if the fullness of being, or of convivial interaction, defines our vision of the perfect good, then giving can be conceived as quintessentially reciprocal; expecting a gift in return need not necessarily diminish the gratuity of a gift.
The true gift would have to be to an absolutely anonymous other-paradigmatically the enemy, suggests Jean-Luc Marion, echoing the Gospels.
| Seed data: | Link 1, Link 2 |
|---|---|
| Host image: | StyleGAN neural net |
| Content creation: | GPT-3.5, |
Host
Ray Hall
Podcast Content
On this plausible reading of the Crito, Socrates believes his imminent death does not give him any reason to escapenot even a reason defeated by justiceand his death is neither a loss nor a sacrifice.As we have seen, Socrates did not recognize any value other than justicenot even the value of his own lifeand did not view his death as an act of selfsacrifice.Any value other than his own was, at bottom, instrumental to his own value.A final oration in which he contemplates taking responsibility for what has happened with that person can be interpreted like it would suggest such valor. It seems reasonable and well known if there are two elements involved1 The need for each case, both physical harm caused when taken into account2. A consequence arising from being killed through bodily injury while on duty whatever might happen afterwards.but no one else could possibly do anything about these things because they were already done without them before their deaths.citation needed Thus all actions involve actual actssuch works may take place under circumstances where something happens very quickly but only after some time rather then later unless someone dies suddenly who died unexpectedly during either event itselfa situation rarely considered necessary except perhaps within certain situations involving events outside society.3b4d "There's little doubt whether our understanding concerning how human beings behave today will change over several decades."5ef67 We see clearly here why so many people die every day instead they probably just don't know much more.It also suggests its possible use is naturalistic based upon moral principles relating specifically toward survival regardlessof sortsto avoid conflict between themselvesthemselves! On average 1 mortality occurs most often among children born out of wedlock,899. As long ago as early childhood participation rates had been higher throughout history due largely primarily solely unto education efforts prioritizes social security benefits against those provided beyond age group levels."10"I believe you'll find plenty good reasons"To conclude below I should point back again.The question remains though"What makes us better off? Because God knows everything!"We must make sure everyone understands exactly precisely whom He wills best. And since His plans come true, knowing nothing comes naturally leads to salvation completely."And yet He hasn't given up trying".So far nobody agrees."