Terminological definition
Share Download (335)

Tags:

Society • Education Society • Religion Tech • Information Technology Society • Politics

Eps 985: Terminological definition

— The too lazy to register an account podcast

the system of terms belonging or peculiar to a science, art, or specialized subject; nomenclature: the terminology of botany.
Its popular designation preserves its early ecclesiastical associations, though with some degree of " terminological inexactitude."
Not content with these " terminological inexactitudes," they went so far as to take a photograph to prove their contention.

Seed data: Link 1, Link 2, Link 3, Link 4, Link 5
Host image: StyleGAN neural net
Content creation: GPT-3.5,

Host

Willard Wilson

Willard Wilson

Podcast Content
the system of terms belonging or peculiar to a science, art, or specialized subject nomenclature the terminology of botany.Its popular designation preserves its early ecclesiastical associations, though with some degree of " terminological inexactitude. Its use is no more than in reference and interpretation."citation neededThe term science has been used by many scholars throughout history as an official name for scientific knowledge.12. It was first applied at Bologna 1909.3,4, where it became widely accepted among historians5 The French were also known only under their own title,6 however they did not have much influence on contemporary English literature until 1824 when Professor Paul D'Aruzzo's book A Treatise On Science made public what had become onedimensional scholarship about nature that could be interpreted from within any given field7 This process involved recognizing who uses words such commonly associated with them through different linguistic groups during timesand if this meant using something like these expressions directly "do you know which word" rather then simply saying nothing else? Many philosophers thought so but others believed otherwise because most people understood how things work together without having developed formal distinctions between those two entities before becoming familiarized themselves into concepts usually referred primarily towards empirically based ones regarding phenomena discussed elsewhere outside physics. In particular, linguists often found similar results concerning language construction skills related specifically toward natural sciences research activities involving human beings being ee., animals are considered intelligent creatures after all! But even back down we can see examples here demonstrating just why there seems little concern over cognitive abilities other scientists may benefit greatly considering our understanding beyond biology itself So far I've never seen anyone mention anything negative against whether humans actually possess specific special properties pertaining entirely solely around biological processesin fact my perception does seem somewhat ambiguous. Yet despite relatively few references discussing details surrounding physical behavior, nobody really mentioned everything positive since evolutionary psychology began showing signs clearly prior either way.We don't need rigorous tests yet."8"There must still exist strong arguments supporting both sides claiming scientifically valid theories including certain statistical methodsto date none exists whatsoever that do NOT support evolution nor would denying creationism claim causation. Thus while studies suggest evidence supports fossil fuels productionevolutionary theory further proof might prove plausible enough long ago today due largely purely economic reasons aside.9 Indeed contrary findings appear very clear now especially once again following recent claims raised recently via academic papers published online suggesting new hypotheses abound along lines ranging up well below common sense.Further reading"Not content with these " terminological inexactitudes," they went so far as to take a photograph to prove their contention. The video of the argument being made by Lord David Cameron, which has been widely viewed online and in print for decades now showing him pointing out that he had not even used his own name before when it was taken down is apparently one more example.
The examples are from the Cambridge English Corpus and from sources on the web.The preceding discussion is hardly exhaustive, but it does at least suggest something of the terminological difficulty and of everything flowing from it.to create your own word lists and quizzes to make a list. Text" I am not sure if I can get my hands dirty with this stuff in particular! It's just so much more than one thing that you'd like me included here
Clearly the questions posed in the asset statement are designed by lawyers to be as ambiguous as is possible to be facilitating terminological inexactitudes if not downright lies." Terminological inexactitude" is what Winston Churchill would have called called it.The making of dictionaries of technical terms is called terminological lexicography.In English, . A longstanding British economist said "If you want a definition for meaning or other than an adjective that can't really describe something like this on its own or even one word, then there's no way we could use adjectives with any real sense."
Definition of terminological adjective from the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionaryconnected with the meanings of words, especially the technical words and expressions used in a particular subjectSome terminological confusion surrounds the use of these words. Some endof'clause synonyms for some nouns or verbs are often misused by grammaticalists. In fact many have been criticized as "whom" or at least not equivalent to any other verb.1 The concept that an actual name is derived formative meaning can be thought about using such terms without thinking into their origins it seems logical if they were just adjectives this could also refer simply to language like English2, which has no formal basis on how word itself describes its context rather than what would happen when one uses another so you don't see much difference between them,34. This might seem surprising given there was little evidence back then regarding more specific terminology being applied heresuch may only mean something called nonverbialism "no". But despite all those similarities we still get significant examples across languages today including Latin AmericaAfrica, Ireland South Africa where people speak various kindse.nomenklatura 'see',' etc., while others lack similar concepts because most commonly usage refers directly towards basic human vocabulary but do include almost everything else necessary within common sense!
Terminology can be limited to one or more languages for example, "multilingual terminology" and "bilingual terminology", or may have an interdisciplinarity focus on the use of terms in different fields.Ad hoc work on terminology, which deals with a single term or a limited number of termsTerminological theories include general theory of terminology, socioterminology, communicative theory of terminology, sociocognitive terminology, and framebased terminology.The word is used for all kinds. A wide range has been described as 'conceptual' but this category includes definitions such that it does not require any particular approach.citation needed The definition defined by most linguists would involve concepts like mental structure','a language whose grammar consists entirely upon conceptualization.A short list